CUT - Sequel To Clearing-Up Times
Monday, 25 April 2016
Something to cogitate;
It seems that there may be something in Venus’ Birkeland
currents affecting the Earth’s mass – it is more of a potato-shape than
before. This could give rise to various
orbital re-arrangements but perhaps not of great significance. In other words a catastrophic view is
OK. The Moment of Inertia tensor can be
for any of the following events finely-balanced i.e. it is enough for Earth to
go through the Venus electric currents and as gravity is an electric phenomenon
for there to be a gravity dipole effect leading to a Mass shift sufficient for
an IITPW z-axis to y-axis flip, etc.
We list the events as a series that are related to each
other. The basic relation operating is
that of the 243-year cycle of same –plane inferior conjunctions. I believe that this is expressed as Transit A
8 years Transit B 105.5
years Transit C 8 years Transit D 121.5 years.
NB the Flood occurs in CUT chronology on day 1, second
month, -3327 (or converted according to Barry Setterfield’s work to 829.13 Ma).
EVENT 1:
-3327 Transit A of a randomly-set up cycle of Venusian-Earth
conjunctions – to suit this argument.
EVENT 2:
-2347 Transit B (4 cycles later) Mr Dodwell’s paper’s Axis
Tilt
EVENT 3:
-1869 and -1861 Transit A and Transit B (2 cycles later) as
observed by Ammi-zaduga (CUT chronology used to establish the reign of
Ammi-zaduga.)
Notes;
1. I
am advised by Barry, in a personal communication, that Mr Dodwell’s -2345 error
bars would allow for -2347.
2. The
case for a chronology of Babylon 1 Dynasty that meets the requirement above for
Ammi-zaduga to observe both transits and take up Kingship in a sole reign on
Transit B can be made as follows;
a.Hammurabi -2008
b.Samsu-iluna -1965
c.Abi-eshuh -1927
d.Ammi-ditana -1899
e.Abi-eshuh cf.
Pesgaldaramash -1896
f.Ammi-zaduga &
Ammi-ditana -1871*
g.Ammi-zaduga -1862
h.Samsu-ditana -1849
i.cf.
Aidarakalamma & end of Ammi-ditana -1846
j.Samsu-ditana -1841
k.cf.
Ekurulanna & end of Samsu-ditana -1818
End of Samsu-ditana and Kassites -1815
*We should note the regnal Year of the Golden
Throne in the reign of Ammi-zaduga is
unknown so we can speculate that it is Year 10 or Transit B in this cycle; if we subtract 1900 from -1861 (-1869
+8=-1861) we get -3761 or the benchmark for the molad of Tishri.
3. CUT
chronology allows the following
-2349 En-anna-tum I (alt.start), grandson of
Ur-Nanshe, king, took Sumer awAmmi-zadugaay from Enshagkushana of Uruk and
repulsed the armies of Kish, Elam and Mari (this was during the 400 yrs of
Ur-Zababa and his "dynasty")
Enshagkushana throws the Elamites
out of Awan earlier in this year.
-2349 Mamagal, the boatman in Kish – I think, and can check
Was this done in anticipation of a Venus event?
We should finalize with comment that the current cycle of
Venusian transits is mis-aligned to the above construct by 16 years.
Monday, 1 February 2016
Thursday, 21 January 2016
A Forum has been established to further, in part, Chronology/Geology connections
Go to
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/12/unconnected-new-geology-items
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/2/ancient-history
There is also other stuff yet to come. Keep in mind repeated and ongoing ridiculous attacks on my computer system mean that I have lost heart in updating with new changes. I am very discouraged since no-one has come to my (CUT's) aid. How sad. What fearful people live on Earth today.
Regards,
elderlyrstaff
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/12/unconnected-new-geology-items
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/6/ancient-history-geology-ready-reckoners
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/5/grand-canyon-geology
http://thewayoflife.freeforums.net/thread/2/ancient-history
Regards,
elderlyrstaff
Saturday, 28 February 2015
Check Out the Red Dates
Keeping in mind -3146 as an important
- s/s fragment
and -3117 to -3115 Babel; -3016 the end of En-mer-kar (Nimrod version one); etc we have, courtesy of Jonathan Gray, the following;
Note the dates in RED. Thery are converted from radiometric years to orbital years (see Barry and Penny Setterfield).
Interesting? You bet. Especially relevant to Pleistocene from -2898 to -2897.
Enjoy.
-3146 | En-dara-ana co-rules with Nan-gish-lishma+ |
and -3117 to -3115 Babel; -3016 the end of En-mer-kar (Nimrod version one); etc we have, courtesy of Jonathan Gray, the following;
Note the dates in RED. Thery are converted from radiometric years to orbital years (see Barry and Penny Setterfield).
You may wonder. Have traces of actual human
beings been found in the wrong places?
Definitely - yes.
For starters, human footprints are found in
undisturbed strata of virtually all geological
“ages”
yes, they've been unearthed in rock layers
where the so-called “earliest” life forms appear.
Here are some examples:
* Gobi Desert: A print of a ribbed sole (shoe or
sandal size 9), in sandstone rock said to be
“2 million years old.” -2899
* Fisher Canyon, Nevada: A shoe print with clear
traces of strong thread, in a coal seam “12 million
years old.” -2903/04
* Pershing County, Nevada: A shoe print, showing
evidence of a well-cut and double-stitched leather
sole, in Triassic limestone “160 to 195 million years old.” -2982/-3006
This find was authenticated by a competent geologist
of the Rockefeller Foundation in New York.
The thread is smaller than any used by shoemakers
today.
The discoverer took it to New York. He took it to
Columbia University. He showed it to some of the
leading people at the American Museum of Natural
History and turned it over to them.
But you can write to the American Museum of Natural
History - and they’ll tell you the report is not
in their files. (I wonder why?)
Anyway, here are some more finds:
* Cow Canyon, Nevada (25 miles east of Lovelock): The
graceful imprint of a well-balanced human in a coal
vein of the Tertiary “period.”
* England: A shoe imprint with nail heads around its
outer edge, in “450 million year old” limestone. -3138
* Antelope Springs, Utah: Prints of a man wearing
shoes, in which the left foot had trodden on a
trilobite, a creature of “440 million years ago.”-3136/37
This Utah discovery was made in the Wheeler Formation,
in the House Range east of Antelope Springs, in
shaley limestone rock.
Prints included one of a child’s foot, with all five
toes showing dimly.
On June 1, 1968, William Meister was looking for
trilobite fossils. With difficulty, he was climbing
a 2000 ft high rock face.
He paused, and broke off a 2 inch thick lump of rock
with his geology hammer. It opened like a book,
revealing a trilobite in the heel of a sandal print.
A consulting geologist was called in. He found more
sandal-prints and some footprints of bare-foot children.
It would seem from this evidence that mankind and
trilobites co-existed.
* Laetolil, Africa: Footprints in rock “12 million
years old.” -2903/04
* Tulsa, Oklahoma: Footprints in rock “12 million
years old.” -2903/04
* Carson City, Nevada: Sandal prints in Pliocene
“age” rock “12 million years old.” -2903/04
* Glen Rose, Texas: Footprints in Cretaceous rock
“70 million years old.” -2936
* Mt. Victoria, Australia: Footprint in Triassic
rock “200 million years old.” -3007
* St. Louis, Missouri: Footprints in Permian rock
“200 million years old.” -3007
* Bera, Kentucky: Footprints in Pennsylvanian
rock “200 million years old.” -3007
* Lake Windermere, England: Sandal print in
Ordovician rock “400 million years old.” -3113
Okay, I don't want to bore you. Examples are
almost countless.
Do you notice something wrong with these
discoveries? That's right. They contradict
evolutionary geology.
EVOLUTIONARY THEORY IN TROUBLE?
If human footprints in ancient rocks are genuine,
then either men existed before evolution says they
should, or our dating systems are in serious error.
As James Madsen, curator of Earth Science at the
University of Utah, stated for the press, concerning
the trilobite-with-man find:
“There’s something of a problem here, since
trilobites and humans are separated by millions of
years” (in theory, over 200 million!).
Indeed, this intimate simultaneous occurrence of
modern (sandal-shod) man with “primitive” trilobites
is a serious problem for the evolution theory.
FAKE "FOOTPRINTS", MAYBE?
Well, you ask, could these tracks be fakes? That's
a fair question.
Sorry, but many of these prints were found “inside”
stratified deposits, where forgery was impossible.
You see, they were found only after removal of
overlying rock strata. ...
Interesting? You bet. Especially relevant to Pleistocene from -2898 to -2897.
Enjoy.
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
'Grief from deadbeats' overwhelms our ability to function for a while
A violent attack upon my computing resources has brought a change of effort in CUT's work and we have to temporarily suspend output.
Sunday, 4 January 2015
A Better Re-run
Rerun of Dynasty One
This short paper looks at all sources, including archaeology, and reconciles all. CUT chronology is the basis for all dating. The start for Menes is obtained from clearing-uptimes.blogspot.com.au.The tectonic connections are treated in various papers – some at academia.edu.
Its a short ride, relies on an understanding of CUT charting techniques (see academia.edu) and is insufferably notey or not proper prose.
I
don't take associations made at Wikipedia for A 1 to A 8 or Abydos
kings 1-8 for granted.
The
Ethiopians or southerners took the north in a series of battles so we
should see certain connections and we do. We need to reference the
Demi-gods as well and we do that too in CUT chronology.
-2781
Nakehte
Kalnis,son of Abd Shems
-2770
Gannkam
-2752
Hohey
-2741
Kasiyope
(queen)
-2722
Sabe
I
-2639
end of En-mer-kar and start of Lugal-Banda (in Mesopotamia)
-2620
GarIak II
We
shall attack this issue of the First Dynasty by looking at extant
sources, then CUT's Public Service (PS) reconstruction and finally
apply our CUT-charting tools. The Abydos king list holds true for
the flow in this new order and is most comforting in this respect.
Thirty-year
sed cycles will be winkled out.
Eratosthenes.
He
is, of course, “all over the place” in our terms I.e. of prince A
following prince B immediately etc. However, we ignore Eratosthenes
at our very great peril. So we, sensibly, will not ignore
Eratosthenes.
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Athothis
-2811 to -2752 or -2813 to -2754 (the
rise of Zemti A5 or Merneith's regency)
Athothis
II -2741 to -2709 or -2743 to -2711
Uennephes
-2752 to -2710
Miebis
-2690 to -2671
Pemphos
-2664 to -2646
We
should now visit anno
mundi 2900, etc. The dynasty is Theban. Theban is 18th
dynasty as far as Eratosthenes is concerned. Theban is Nubian in
latter 18th/early 19th dynasties. Makeda is the
last of her line in Nubia. She ends -1209. Osorkon II can be
associated with Nubia and Thebes . He ends -1207. Now anno
mundi 3045 can be guessed at. Working BACKWARDS, never a
good idea, we can build the following equations
- -1207-3045 = -4252.
- -1611 -2900 = -4511 Eus.
Points
to consider re dating above;
- Flood -3326-969 (little green book-Loeb Classic Series) -4295 Eus. Correction is 48 yrs - see academia.edu for an endless diatribe on this topic. -4295+48=-4247 (Talmudists). Cf. -4252 will develop later.
- AM (real 7 days of Creation) to Adam is 1058 yrs
- Eus. And Afr. provide two numbers 2242 and 2262 for “Adam to Flood”.
- AM Afr. -5589 and AM Eus. -5569 reflect above divergence. By equating, in a playful way, Adam and real Creation we can discover that Adam was created in -5589 + 1058 = -4531 Afr. And -5569 + 1058 = -4511 Eus. QED.
- -1611 is as follows; Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscription 11, 290 days drift + Heliopolitan corection which is 1 day earlier / 4 degrees of Lattitude = 294. Years corresponding are counted from the DD of Demi-God Ammon's sed renewal in -2787. So -2787 +4*294 = -1611 cf. Kahun and Ebers.
6. Djer is said to have a heliacal rising; Wikipedia; lets try -2787 or Year 1 or 1 following an accession year of Djer and see it looks good.
The
interesting question is why Eratosthenes has started Theban dynastic
history at Menes not Ahmose I. Probably
scene-setting.
Next cab off the rank is Africanus (Manetho's Epitome).
But first lets do a Public Service review or model.
Demi-Gods;
Heracles
-2888 to -2818
Ammon
-2818 to -2748
…..
Zeus -2729
to -2709
Pre-
or Dynastic;
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Edjo
-2811 to -2741
Teti
-2813 to -2743
Djer
-2789 to -2719
Iti=Kenkenes
-2784 to -2711 or -2784 to -2709
Mer-neith
-2781 to -2711
Ita=Uennephes -2770
to -2700
Den=Usaphais
=Zemti -2749 to -2679
Semempses
-2719 to -2647
Sneferka
-2789 to -2719
Seket
-2709 to -2639
Miebis
-2705 to -2631 (regnal count from -2700)
Qa'a=Kaa=Bieneches -2680
to -2610
Kebh=Kourodes
-2671 to -2601
Hotepsekhemwy=Boethos
-2657 to -2562
Kaiechos=Kakau
-2631 to -2561
Horus:
Bird? -2620 to -2566 (short of a full term)
Banetjeru=Binothris
-2611 to -2516 or -2515
Seth-Peribsen
-2589 to -2519
Nubnefer
-2581 to -2516
Sekhemyeb
Perenmae -2567 to -2497
Tlas=Wadjnes
-2552 to -2482
Weneg
-2545 to -2475
T
2.22 Ba? -2536 to -2466
Aristarchos=Za
-2516 to -2445
Senedj
-2506 to -2436
Kara
-2498 to -2428
Neferkare
-2745 to -2394 in two goes
Neferkasokar
-2475 to -2405
Djadjay
-2437 to -2367
Hudjefa
-2428 to -2394
Bebti
-2413 to -2367
Sesochris=Momchieri
-2434 to -2355
Cheneres=Khasekhemwy
-2395 to -2325
“The
succession of the first three kings of the 2nd Dynasty is found on
the back of the right shoulder of the statue of a priest named
Hotepdief as follows: Hotepsekhemwi,
Nebre
and Ninetjer.”
Africanus
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Athothis
-2811 to -2754
Kenkenes
-2754 to -2723
Uenephes
-2723 to -2700
Usaphais
-2710 to -2690
Miebis
-2690 to -2664
Semempses
-2664 to -2646
Bieneches
-2646 to -2620
NB
-2873+253=-2620
Eusebius
Menes
-2873 to -2813
Athothis
-2789 to -2762
Kenkenes
-2762 to -2723
Uenephes
-2752 to -2710
Usaphais
-2710 to -2690
Miebis
-2690 to -2664
Semempses
-2664 to -2646
Bieneches
-2649 to -2621
NB
-2873+252=-2621
Book of Sothis
Athothis
-2782 to -2754
Kenkenes
-2762 to -2723
Uennephes
-2752 to -2710
Palermo Stone in three fragments Oxford, Cairo C5 and main.
Usaphais
(Den) -2745 to -2711
Miebdis
-2690 to -2664
Pemphos
-2657 (incl. Coronation year – joint with Hotepsekhemwy) -2657 to
-2646
Tory's
sed cycle – does it exist in Dynasty
#1 of Egypt?
-2858,
-2843, -2788, -2783(?), -2781, -2751, -2740,
-2718, -2689, -2670, -2660, -2649, -2627
QED
sed.
Are there any keys, daisy-chains, post-keys or follow-ons (end-to-ends)?
Djer
keys the demi-god Ammon,
Iti=Kenkenes
keysTeti,
Athothis
(Book of Sothis) keys Edjo
Merneith
post-keys Edjo
Uennephes
(Book of Sothis/Eus) keys Merneith
Den
daisy-chains Ammon, demi-god
One
regnal count of Den keys Uennephes
A
second regnal count starts with a second regnal count for Uennephes –
no joy here though
Athothis
II (Eratos.) follows-on Teti; ending one regnal count co-terminal
with Uennephes which leads CUT to wonder whether Uenephes – a
child, in -2762 of 8 years; a youth, in -2752 of 18 years – had a
regent, his mother from her renewal sed, till he reached 47 yrs in
-2723. His majority coming in -2742 cf. -2743 he is the
're-incarnation' of the now defunct and probably dead Athothis.
Sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?
Semempses
keys Den's sed
Den
follows-on on two regnal starts a) Uennephes - sort of - and b)
Kenkenes really
Den
and Uennephes 'sort of' parallel rule, -2710 to -2700, includes the
end of Djer in -2705 and a five year hiatus before a regnal count for
Miebis because Miebis followed-on Djer.
Miebis
follows-on in -2700 Kenkenes
Den
now kicks on without Uennephes till -2690 when Miebis sort of keys
Semempses and Sneferka actually keys Semempses
Qa'a
daisy-chains Den in -2780
Even
though we can picture Kebh as keying Miebis he really doesn't start a
regnal count till the end of Miebis' second repeat sed. At which time
Semempses and Kebh joint-rule
Semempses
seems to have set up Boethos Hotepsekhemwy as a counter to Miebis in
-2757 – possibly a political or dynastic move
Horus
Bird follows-on Sneferka
Banetjeru
daisy-chains Qa'a
Kakau
follows-on Miebis
Seth-Peribsen
post-keys Horus: Bird
So what can we say in summary?
The
“destruction of Egypt” of Semempses Year 1 record is the same as
Boethos' “great calamity”. That is to say a huge earthquake –
remember the continents, at this time (orbital see
Setterfield), have not long assumed their almost modern
tectonic placements – at Bubastis wiped out a good portion of the
populace in -2656. This placed the second dynasty at the crossroads.
From -2620 dynasty one is no more but a new dynasty and a renewed
Egypt are on the go starting with Boethos in -2627. The first prince
born into - or who was only small at the time of Bubastis - this new
world is Kakau and he assumes power in a sort of follow-on (CUT
sometimes ues the term 'end-to-end') from Kebh in -2601.
The
beginning of the dynasty saw the passing of the baton from the
demi-gods to the dynastic era kings. We can weave, however
inexpertly, nearly all the 'known' kings into our dynasty one
tapestry. The prevailing notion is one of orderly but not uniform
transition from king to king. The lesson of Den (regnal count -
Palermo Stone fragments, The Oxford fragment -
4th -2745, 5th -2744, 6th -2743, 7th
-2742; regnal count - The
Cairo-Stone fragment C5
18th
-2723,
19th
-2722,
20th
-2721,
21st -2720, 22nd
-2219)
shows
us the multiplicity of regnal counts for one king. Mostly
representing co-rules till some significant point of transition e.g.
the end of a 70-year period of public service – not all as top dog.
Merneith
(mother of Djet and Den) see Wiki item re two “cartouches” for
Mother of King, Athothis and Uennephes definitely have the smell
of another go of Osiris, Isis, Horus etc. Whether a recycle or what,
we see at least the outline of a pattern of historical events that
are by our Creator recycled.
We
should note in connection with long reigns in TC which receive so
much derision, in the literature, that Biblical patriarch
contemporaries such as Heber , Peleg and Reu ruled 80 years, 52 years
(-2818 to -2766) and 132 years respectively -see CUT chronology. So
Djer's 84 years is WELL within the bounds of reality.
The
Palermo Stone gives the following series of Kings in the view of CUT
chronology. From Breasted;
First
Dynasty King T = Djer (Breasted, vol I, p.57 line 92
is 6 months 7 days – in funny talk this is Peret III, day 7 cf.
Wikipedia article re calendar entry (unspecifed) “death of Djer
on Peret III, day 7” QED); King U = Kenkenes = Iti NB: from a DD
of -3174 cf. Noah, 103 days drift brings us to -2762 the first year
of a Kenkenes regnal count (Book of Sothis/Eus.); Lost kings
(incl. Den = Usaphais = Zemti etc); King V = Djet (Uennephes =Ita);
Second
Dynasty King Neterimu = Banetjeru = Binothris; Lost kings; King W =
Chaires = Kara; King X = Djadjay.
These
lead us to point out that Wikipedia on Den includes a portion of
Palermo Stone 28th...41st year which belong to
Uenephes as 28th -2743, 29th -2742 etc. The
thirty-one years could possibly be thirty-two years. NB a
small research opportunity exists to find Year 32. This is
also Athothis II of Eratosthenes.
Missing Years?
The
Abydos King List remains intact, in the sense of there are no years
'missing' from the start year of first king to the end date of the
last king;
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Teti
-2813 to -2743
Iti
-2784 to -2714
Ita
-2770 to -2700
Septi
(Zemti) -2749 to -2679
Meribiap
-2705 to -2631
Semsu
-2719 to -2647
Qebeh
-2671 to -2601
Sakkhara
King List is intact, in the sense of there are no years 'missing'
from the start year of first king to the end date of the last king;
Miebis
-2705 to -2631
Kourodes
-2671 (-2664) to -2601
End of Dynasty One /Start of Dynasty Two Controversy
To
reconcile Eus./and Armenian recension we have the following;
Eus.
297 years, and 549 from “beginning” Arm. 297 years
Dealing
with 549 years. Mestraim in Book of Sothis is equated to Menes. CUT
puts Mestraim/Menes at -2846. Therefore we can sum -2846 + 549 to
-2297 or Tosorthros of Eus/Afr. Dynasty #3 in CUT chronology. OR, we
can sum as follows; -2873 + 549 = -2324. This works if Gosiormes /
Hotepsekhemwy has a PS of -2394 to -2324 as opposed to -2395 to
-2325. This is actually a 'better' PS in this model. In other words
Eus. Confirms Afr. - maybe for the first time!!
The
297 of Eus. is Kebh as the first Dynasty #2 king (remember Eus. is a
pest of a pedant) or -2664 + 297 = -2367 or the end of Bebty,
in CUT chronology, and also the end of the royal line.
A Rerun of Dynasty Two
We should note that there is little
consistency as to whether the regnal count at a key is from the key
or post-key year e.g. Nubnefer keys Banetjeru in -2581/-2580 – his
Year 30. He could start a regnal count in -2580 i.e. Year 1 of this
regnal count is -2581/-2580 OR he could start in -2579 i.e.
Year 1 of this regnal count is -2580/-2579. If he takes the first
option then his sed year is -2552/-2551. Tlas is set down as a key
to Nubnefer ie his Public Service (PS) runs -2552 to -2482 (assuming
as CUT has a model PS). The Palermo Stone material for Banetjeru has
a 7th year entry in -2581/-2580 and a 8th year
entry in -2580/-2579. In other words Banetjeru has a parallel or
Joint rule with Nubnefer. However the 36th to 44th
year is a standard regnal count for Banetjeru from his sed
-2580/-2579. The 36th Year coincidentally corresponds to
the first Year of Weneg – assuming he is not Tlas.
Another way of illustrating this
principle is with Horus: Bird (CUT) -2621 daisy-chains Sneferka (CUT)
-2690 to -2620. In -2589 Seth-Peribsen (CUT) post-keys Bird. Thus
Bird, in this model, would have started a regnal count in -2619 or he
opted to post-key Seket's (-2650 to -2580) sed. Remember Seket in
this model would have keyed Ka'a and may have started a regnal count
in -2649. We should note that Baunetjer's 95 years were somewhat of
an extra beyond Year 70. In other words Banetjeru's first Palermo
Stone regnal count started (-2587) in an end-to-end anticipation
of his retirement – but it didn't happen!
We can take a further look at the
predictive value of the model. When the end of Banetjeru comes in
-2515 then Sesthenes comes to light He rules 70 yrs (end-to-end) from
-2515 to -2445. Stoichos of Eratosthenes is our confounding element.
He rules, in an end-to-end from Tlas (-2552 to -2482), from -2482 to
-2412 thus providing a daisy-chain to Neferkasokar in -2413 – an
IMPORTANT date or DD. Senedj has a regnal count from -2482. The
problem with this arrangement is that it does not lead to a
-2873+555= -2318 end of Dynasty One and Two. My conclusion is 555 it
is just a check-digit.
From Kim Ryholt, p.7 of 21, “The
Turin King-List”, academia.edu, Dec 25, 2014; 3:48 am we have
...
Heading for the Ist-I0th Dynasties (3.10)
" [Kings of the house of (?) king Menes."
Summation for the 1st-5th
Dynasties (4.26)
"Total of kings from Menes until [Unas: x
amounting to
767 (or 768) years . J "
Summation for the 6th-8th
Dynasties (5.14-15)
" [Total of] kings [until Neferirkare: xJ
amounting to 181
years, 6 months, 3 days, and a lacuna of 6 (years).
Total:
1 [87 years, 6 months, and 3 days J . "
Summation for the Ist-8th
Dynasties (5.15-17)
" [Total ofJ kings37 [fromJ Menes; their kingship,
their
years, and a lacuna [thereto J : 9 [ 4J 9 years and 15
days, and
a lacuna of 6 years. Total: [x kings amounting toJ 955
years
and 1 [5 J days." ….
Operating
on the basis of the Exodus year (-1580 to -1579) for CUT chronology
purposes we can have the following material to digest or throw-up.
From
-1580 backwards according to 1st-5th
Dynasties (4.26) total
i.e. by 768 years we
come to -2348 the SECOND AXIS tilt. By
going forward to Ist-8th
Dynasties (5.15-17) total
we arrive at -1393 cf.
Harmessus Miamum. By going
backwards from -1393 according
to 6th-8th
Dynasties (5.14-15) i.e.
by 187 years we come
to -1580. To conclude then
Dynasty 1-5 ends at Exodus and Dynasty 6-8 starts at Exodus.
CUT
is in error on this point. Africanus
gives 146 years for Dynasty #6 i.e. -1625
to -1479.
That's
it for our revision to date for Dynasty One of Egypt.
Post-Script
It
is possible that Djer is Kenkenes = Iti.
He would have started his sed regnal count with Aha = Teti =
Athothis' keyed sed in -2784. Nothing particularly stands in
the way of a -2705 end as opposed to -2714. In this way we can
validate king Qa'a seal list of kings i.e.
Narmer,
Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qáa from
Ottar Vendel's great website Ottar
Vendel Sun
Dec 21 9:28 PM AEST
Menes
-2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723,
Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2710 to -2690, Miebis -2690 to
-2671, Semempses -2664 to -2646, Bieneches -2649 to -2621 [gaps
are fully-covered in the full treatment]
/and
validate king Den's list of kings i.e. Narmer,
Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Meretneit
Menes
-2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723,
Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2723 to -2718, Merneith -2781 to
-2711
-----The
End (not of me, quite yet)-----
Saturday, 20 December 2014
Correction to Dynasty One
Rerun of Dynasty One
I
don't take associations made at Wikipedia for A 1 to A 8 or Abydos
kings 1-8.
The
Ethiopians or southerners took the north in a series of battles so we
should see certain connections and we do. We need to reference the
Demi-gods as well and we do that too in CUT chronology.
-2781
Nakehte
Kalnis,son of Abd Shems
-2770
Gannkam
-2752
Hohey
-2741
Kasiyope
(queen)
-2722
Sabe
I
-2639
end of En-mer-kar and start of Lugal-Banda (in Mesopotamia)
-2620
GarIak II
We
shall attack this by looking at each source, then Public Service (PS)
and finally apply our tools. Abydos holds true for the flow in this
new order.
Thirty-year
sed cycles will be winkled out.
Eratosthenes.
He is, of course, “all over the place” in our terms of prince A
following prince B immediately etc. However, we ignore Eratosthenes
at our very great peril. So we, sensibly, will not ignore
Eratosthenes.
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Athothis -2811
to -2752 or -2813 to -2754 (the
rise of Zemti A5 or Merneith's regency)
Athothis
II -2741 to -2709 or -2743 to -2711
Uennephes -2752
to -2710
Miebis -2690
to -2671
Pemphos -2664
to -2646
We
should now visit anno
mundi 2900, etc. The dynasty is Theban. Theban is 18th
dynasty as far as Eratosthenes is concerned. Theban is Nubian in
latter 18th/early 19th dynasties. Makeda is
the last of her line in Nubia. She ends -1209. Osorkon II can be
associated with Nubia and Thebes . He ends -1207. Now anno
mundi 3045 can be guessed at. Working BACKWARDS
-1207-3045 = -4252. -1611 -2900 = -4511 Eus.
Points
to consider re dating above;
- Flood -3326-969 (little green book) -4295 Eus. Correction is 48 yrs - see academia.edu for an endless diatribe on this topic. -4295+48=-4247 (Talmudists). Cf. -4252 will develop later.
- AM (real 7 days of Creation) to Adam is 1058 yrs
- Eus. And Afr. provide two numbers 2242 and 2262 for “Adam to Flood”.
- AM Afr. -5589 and AM Eus. -5569 reflect above divergence. By equating, in a playful way, Adam and real Creation we can discover that Adam was created in -5589 + 1058 = -4531 Afr. And -5569 + 1058 = -4511 Eus. QED.
- -1611 is as follows; Gebel Tjauti Rock Inscription 11, 290 days drift + Heliopolitan corection which is 1day earlier / 4 degrees of Lattitude = 294. Years corresponding are counted from the DD of Demi-God Ammon's sed renewal in -2787. So -2787 +4*294 = -1611 cf. Kahun and Ebers.
The
interesting question is why Eratosthenes has started Theban dynastic
history at Menes not Ahmose I. Probably
scene-setting.
Next
cab off the rank is Africanus (Manetho's Epitome).
But
first lets do a Public Service review or model.
Demi-Gods;
Heracles -2888
to -2818
Ammon -2818
to -2748
Pre-
or Dynastic;
Menes -2873
to -2811
Edjo -2811
to -2741
Teti -2813
to -2743
Djer -2789
to -2719
Iti=Kenkenes
-2784 to -2711 or -2784 to -2709
Mer-neith -2781
to -2711
Ita=Uennephes -2770
to -2700
Den=Usaphais =Zemti-2749
to -2679
Semempses -2719
to -2647
Sneferka -2789
to -2719
Miebis
-2705 to -2631 (regnal count from -2700)
Qa'a=Kaa -2680
to -2610
Kebh=Kourodes -2671
to -2601
Kaiechos=Kakau -2631
to -2561
Horus:
Bird? -2620 to -2566 (short of a full term)
Banetjeru=Binothris -2611
to -2516 or -2515
Seth-Peribsen -2589
to -2519
Nubnefer -2581
to -2516
Sekhemyeb
Perenmae -2567 to -2497
Tlas=Wadjnes -2552
to -2482
Weneg -2545
to -2475
T
2.22 Ba? -2536 to -2466
Aristarchos=Za -2516
to -2445
Senedj -2506
to -2436
Kara -2498
to -2428
Neferkare -2745
to -2394 in two goes
Neferkasokar -2475
to -2405 or
Djadjay -2437
to -2367
Hudjefa -2428
to -2394
Bebti -2413
to -2367
Sesochris=Momchieri -2434to
-2355
Cheneres=Khasekhemwy -2395
to -2325
From
;http://www.ancient-egypt.org/_v3d/index.html
we have
“The
succession of the first three kings of the 2nd Dynasty is found on
the back of the right shoulder of the statue of a priest named
Hotepdief as follows: Hotepsekhemwi, Nebre
and Ninetjer.”
Africanus
forsooth.
Menes -2873
to -2811
Athothis -2811
to -2754
Kenkenes -2754
to -2723
Uenephes -2723
to -2700
Usaphais -2710
to -2690
Miebis -2690
to -2664
Semempses -2664
to -2646
Bieneches -2646
to -2620
NB
-2873+253=-2620
Eusebius
forsooth forsooth!.
Menes -2873
to -2813
Athothis -2789
to -2762
Kenkenes -2762
to -2723
Uenephes -2752
to -2710
Usaphais -2710
to -2690
Miebis -2690
to -2664
Semempses -2664
to -2646
Bieneches -2649
to -2621
NB
-2873+252=-2621
Book
of Sothis – relax.
Athothis -2782
to -2754
Kenkenes -2762
to -2723
Uennephes -2752
to -2710
Palermo
Stone in three fragments Oxford, Cairo C5 and main.
Usaphais
(Den) -2745 to -2711
Miebdis -2690
to -2664
Pemphos -2657
(incl. Coronation year – joint with Hotepsekhemwy) -2657 to -2646
Tory's
sed cycle – does it exist in Dynasty
#1 of Egypt?
-2858,
-2843, -2788, -2783(?), -2781, -2751,
-2740, -2718, -2689, -2670, -2660, -2649, -2627
QED
sed.
Are
there any keys, daisy-chains, post-keys or follow-ons?
Djer
keys the demi-god Ammon,
Iti=Kenkenes
keysTeti,
Athothis
(Book of Sothis) keys Edjo
Merneith
post-keys Edjo
Uennephes
(Book of Sothis/Eus) keys Merneith
Den
daisy-chains Ammon, demi-god
One
regnal count of Den keys Uennephes
A
second regnal count starts with a second regnal count for Uennephes –
no joy here though
Athothis
II (Eratos.) follows-on Teti; ending one regnal count co-terminal
with Uennephes which leads CUT to wonder whether Uenephes – a
child, in -2762 of 8 years; a youth, in -2752 of 18 years – had a
regent, his mother from her renewal sed, till he reached 40 yrs or
command of the army stage in -2723. His majority coming in -2742 cf.
-2743 he is the 're-incarnation' of the now defunct and probably dead
Athothis. Sounds a bit familiar doesn't it?
Semempses
keys Den's sed
Den
follows-on on two regnal starts a) Uennephes - sort of - and b)
Kenkenes really
Den
and Uennephes 'sort of' parallel rule, -2710 to -2700, includes the
end of Djer in -2705 and a five year hiatus before a regnal count for
Miebis because Miebis followed-on Djer.
Miebis
follows-on in -2700 Kenkenes
Den
now kicks on without Uennephes till -2690 when Miebis sort of keys
Semempses and Sneferka actually keys Semempses
Qa'a
daisy-chains Den in -2780
Even
though we can picture Kebh as keying Miebis he really doesn't start a
regnal count till the end of Miebis' second repeat sed. At which
time Semempses and Kebh joint-rule
Semempses
seems to have set up Boethos Hotepsekhemwy as a counter to Miebis in
-2757 – possibly a political or dynastic move
Horus
Bird follows-on Sneferka
Banetjeru
daisy-chains Qa'a
Kakau
follows-on Miebis
Seth-Peribsen
post-keys Horus: Bird
So
what can we say in summary?
The
“destruction of Egypt” of Semempses Year 1 record is the same as
Boethos' “great calamity”. That is to say a huge earthquake –
remember the continents have not long assumed their modern tectonic
placements – at Bubastis wiped out a good portion of the populace
in -2656. This placed the second dynasty at the crossroads. From
-2620 dynasty one is no more but a new dynasty and a renewed Egypt
are on the go starting with Boethos in -2627. The first prince born
into - or who was only small at the time of Bubastis - this new world
is Kakau and he assumes power in a sort of follow-on (CUT sometimes
ues the term 'end-to-end') from Kebh in -2601.
The
beginning of the dynasty saw the passing of the baton from the
demi-gods to the dynastic era kings. We can weave, however
inexpertly, nearly all the 'known' kings into our dynasty one
tapestry. The prevailing notion is one of orderly but not uniform
transition from king to king. The lesson of Den (regnal
count - Palermo Stone fragments, The Oxford
fragment - 4th -2745, 5th -2744, 6th
-2743, 7th -2742; regnal count - The
Cairo-Stone fragment C5
18th
-2723, 19th
-2722, 20th
-2721, 21st -2720, 22nd
-2219) shows
us the multiplicity of regnal counts for one king. Mostly
representing co-rules till some significant point of transition e.g.
the end of a 70-year period of public service – not all as top dog.
Merneith
(mother of Djet and Den) see Wiki item re two “cartouches” for
Mother of King, Athothis and Uennephes definitely have the smell
of another go of Osiris, Isis, Horus etc. Whether a recycle or what,
we see at least the outline of a pattern of historical events that
are by our Creator recycled.
We
should note in connection with long reigns in TC which receive so
much derision, in the literature, that Biblical patriarch
contemporaries such as Heber , Peleg and Reu ruled 80 years, 52 years
(-2818 to -2766) and 132 years respectively -see CUT chronology. So
Djer's 84 years is WELL within the bounds of reality.
The
Palermo Stone gives the following series of Kings in the view of CUT
chronology. From Breasted;
First
Dynasty King T = Djer (Breasted, p.57 line 92 is 6 months 7 days –
in funny talk this is Peret III, day 7 cf. Wikipedia article
re calendar entry (unspecifed) “death of Djer on Peret III, day 7”
QED); King U = Kenkenes = Iti NB: from a DD of -3174 cf. Noah, 103
days drift brings us to -2762 the first year of a Kenkenes regnal
count (Book of Sothis/Eus.); Lost kings (incl. Den = Usaphais =
Zemti etc); King V = Djet (Uennephes =Ita);
Second
Dynasty King Neterimu = Banetjeru = Binothris; Lost kings; King W =
Chaires = Kara; King X = Djadjay.
These
lead us to point out that Wikipedia on Den includes a portion of
Palermo Stone 28th...41st year which belong to
Uenephes as 28th -2743, 29th -2742 etc. The
thirty-one years could possibly be thirty-two years. Any budding
post-docs? This is also Athothis II of Eratosthenes.
The
Abydos King List remains intact;
Menes
-2873 to -2811
Teti -2813
to -2743
Iti -2784
to -2714
Ita -2770
to -2700
Septi
(Zemti) -2749 to -2679
Meribiap -2705
to -2631
Semsu -2719
to -2647
Qebeh -2671
to -2601
Sakkhara
King List is intact;
Miebis -2705
to -2631
Kourodes -2671
(-2664) to -2601
To
reconcile Eus./and Armenian recension we have the following;
Eus.
297 years, and 549 from “beginning” Arm. 298 years
Dealing
with 549 years. Mestraim in Book of Sothis is equated to Menes. CUT
puts Mestraim/Menes at -2846. Therefore we can sum -2846 + 549 to
-2297 or Tosorthros of Eus/Afr. Dynasty #3 in CUT chronology.
The
297 of Eus. is Kebh as the first Dynasty #2 king (remember Eus. is a
pest of a pedant) or -2664 + 297 = -2367 or the end of Bebty, in CUT
chronology, and also the end of the royal line.
The
Armenian recension of Eus. has -2646 (giving the whole year -2647 to
-2646 as -2646) to -2348 (-2646+298=-2348) or the end of Nebka – some regard
this at the end of Dynasty #2 for whatever reason.
That's
it for our revision to date for Dynasty One of Egypt.
PS It is possible that Djer is Kenkenes = Iti. He would have started his sed regnal count with Aha = Teti = Athothis' keyed sed in -2784. Nothing particularly stands in the way of a -2705 end as opposed to -2714. In this way we can validate king Qa'a seal list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qáa from Ottar Vendel's great website Ottar Vendel Sun Dec 21, 11:26AM
Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2710 to -2690, Miebis -2690 to -2671, Semempses -2664 to -2646, Bieneches -2649 to -2621/and validate king Den's list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Meretneit
Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2723 to -2718, Merneith -2781 to -2711
PS It is possible that Djer is Kenkenes = Iti. He would have started his sed regnal count with Aha = Teti = Athothis' keyed sed in -2784. Nothing particularly stands in the way of a -2705 end as opposed to -2714. In this way we can validate king Qa'a seal list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qáa from Ottar Vendel's great website Ottar Vendel Sun Dec 21, 11:26AM
Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2710 to -2690, Miebis -2690 to -2671, Semempses -2664 to -2646, Bieneches -2649 to -2621/and validate king Den's list of kings i.e. Narmer, Aha, Djer, Djet, Den, Meretneit
Menes -2873 to -2811, Athothis -2813 to -2754, Kenkenes -2762 to -2723, Uenephes -2754 to -2700, Usaphais -2723 to -2718, Merneith -2781 to -2711